The international journal of healthcare improvement
Qual Saf Health Care 2009;18:424-428 doi:10.1136/qshc.2009.036954 L Leape1, D Berwick1,2, C Clancy3, J Conway2, P Gluck4, J Guest5, D Lawrence6, J Morath7, D O’Leary8, P O’Neill9, D Pinakiewicz4, T Isaac101 Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA2 Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA3 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Bethesda, Maryland, USA4 National Patient Safety Foundation, Boston, Massachusetts, USA5 Consumers Union, Yonkers, New York, USA6 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan (retired), Oakland, California, USA7 Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA8 The Joint Commission (retired), USA9 Alcoa (retired), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA10 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USATen years ago, the Institute of Medicine reported alarming data on the scope and impact of medical errors in the US and called for national efforts to address this problem. While efforts to improve patient safety have proliferated during the past decade, progress toward improvement has been frustratingly slow. Some of this lack of progress may be attributable to the persistence of a medical ethos, institutionalized in the hierarchical structure of academic medicine and healthcare organizations, that discourages teamwork and transparency and undermines the establishment of clear systems of accountability for safe care. The Lucian Leape Institute, established by the US National Patient Safety Foundation to provide vision and strategic direction for the patient safety work, has identified five concepts as fundamental to the endeavor of achieving meaningful improvement in healthcare system safety. These five concepts are transparency, care integration, patient/consumer engagement, restoration of joy and meaning in work, and medical education reform. This paper introduces the five concepts and illustrates the meaning and implications of each as a component of a vision for healthcare safety improvement. In future roundtable sessions, the Institute will further elaborate on the meaning of each concept, identify the challenges to implementation, and issue recommendations for policy makers, organizations, and healthcare professionals.
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BMJ Quality & Safety.
View free sample issue >>

View the original article here
This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق