الأربعاء، 8 أغسطس 2012

Failures in communication and information transfer across the surgical care pathway: interview study

Failures in communication and information transfer across the surgical care pathway: interview study -- Nagpal et al. -- BMJ Quality and Safety Search the BMJ BMJ BMJ Journals BMJ Careers BMJ Learning Evidence Centre doc2doc BMJ Group Search this site

Advanced search

The international journal of healthcare improvement Online First Current issue Archive About the journal Submit a paper Subscribe Help Online First Current issue Archive Supplements eLetters Topic collections RSS Home > Online First > Article rss BMJ Qual Saf doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000886 Original research Failures in communication and information transfer across the surgical care pathway: interview studyThis article has been UnlockedFree via Creative Commons: OPEN ACCESS Kamal Nagpal, Sonal Arora, Amit Vats, Helen W Wong, Nick Sevdalis, Charles Vincent, Krishna Moorthy
Centre for Patient Safety and Surgical Quality, Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK Correspondence to Sonal Arora, Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, Imperial College London, 10th floor, QEQM, St Mary's Hospital, South Wharf Road, London W2 1NY, UK; sonal.arora06{at}imperial.ac.uk Contributors KN, KM, NS, CV were involved in conception and design, analysis and interpretation of data. KN, HW, SA, AV were involved in acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data. SA, KN, AV, HWW drafted the initial article. KM, NS, CV revised it critically for important intellectual content. KN, SA, AV, HWW, NS, CV, KM had final approval of the version to be published.

Accepted 10 April 2012 Published Online First 7 July 2012 Abstract Background and Objectives Effective communication is imperative to safe surgical practice. Previous studies have typically focused upon the operating theatre. This study aimed to explore the communication and information transfer failures across the entire surgical care pathway.

Methods Using a qualitative approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 members of the multidisciplinary team (seven surgeons, five anaesthetists and six nurses) in an acute National Health Service trust. Participants' views regarding information transfer and communication failures at each phase of care, their causes, effects and potential interventions were explored. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and submitted to emergent theme analysis. Sampling ceased when categorical and theoretical saturation was achieved.

Results Preoperatively, lack of communication between anaesthetists and surgeons was the most common problem (13/18 participants). Incomplete handover from the ward to theatre (12/18) and theatre to recovery (15/18) were other key problems. Work environment, lack of protocols and primitive forms of information transfer were reported as the most common cause of failures. Participants reported that these failures led to increased morbidity and mortality. Healthcare staff were strongly supportive of the view that standardisation and systematisation of communication processes was essential to improve patient safety.

Conclusions This study suggests communication failures occur across the entire continuum of care and the participants opined that it could have a potentially serious impact on patient safety. This data can be used to plan interventions targeted at the entire surgical pathway so as to improve the quality of care at all stages of the patient's journey.

Communication information transfer handover interview surgery checklists patient safety root cause analysis risk management Footnotes Funding The research described here was supported by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) and the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC).

Competing interests None.

Ethics approval The project protocol was submitted to the National Research Ethics Service (Joint UCL/UCLH Committees on the Ethics of Human Research). They felt it was a ‘service evaluation’ study so did not require ethical approval. REC reference number: 08/H0715/112.

Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.

Add to CiteULikeCiteULike Add to ConnoteaConnotea Add to DeliciousDelicious Add to DiggDigg Add to FacebookFacebook Add to Google+Google+ Add to MendeleyMendeley Add to RedditReddit Add to TechnoratiTechnorati Add to TwitterTwitter What's this?

This article has been Unlocked Free via Creative Commons: OPEN ACCESS This Article Abstract Full text PDF Services Email this link to a friend Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Alert me when eletters are published Article Usage Statistics Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request permissions Add to portfolio Responses Submit a response No responses published Citing articles Load citing article information Citing articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Nagpal, K. Articles by Moorthy, K. Search for related content PubMed PubMed citation Articles by Nagpal, K. Articles by Moorthy, K. Related Content Unlocked Load related web page information Social bookmarking Add to CiteULikeCiteULike Add to ConnoteaConnotea Add to DeliciousDelicious Add to DiggDigg Add to FacebookFacebook Add to Google+Google+ Add to MendeleyMendeley Add to RedditReddit Add to TechnoratiTechnorati Add to TwitterTwitter What's this?

Free sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BMJ Quality & Safety.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

The Health Foundation logo Online First : Online First Current issue : Current issue | Mobile site Archive : Archive | Supplements | eLetters | Topic collections | RSS About the journal : About the journal | Editorial board | Instructions for authors | Unlocked |
                                   Thank you to our reviewers | Most read articles | Events Submit a paper : Online submission site | Instructions for authors | Unlocked | Track your article Subscribe : Subscribe to the journal | Prices | Email alerts Help : Contact us | Feedback form | Reprints | Permissions | Advertising Subscribe here
Activate your subscription User Name Password Remember me. Forgot your sign in details? Login via Athens or your home organisation
Recommend to your Institution  email alerts Register to receive email alerts   twitter  face-
book  my folders  Library recom-
mend

Online ISSN 2044-5423

Contact us | Website terms & conditions | Revenue sources | Privacy and Cookies | Home | Top

Copyright © 2012 by BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Health Foundation. All rights reserved.

BMJ Journals

View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

ليست هناك تعليقات:

إرسال تعليق